Education
Out And About In West Vancouver – Part Two
I filed my nomination papers on October 12, 2011, and I’m not quite sure how this happened, but five weeks have passed since then. A blink of an eye, a heartbeat, a breath.
It has been an intense five weeks: not so much because of the new challenge of running an election campaign for the first time, but because of the way the demands on my time and attention as a Mom, a candidate, an employee, a graduate student, and a volunteer seemed to escalate at the same time.
As much as I’ve enjoyed the experience, I have to admit I’m looking forward to kicking back tomorrow night, after what’s sure to be a frenetic day, to watch the results roll in once the polls have closed.
And even though tomorrow’s election day, I’ve already begun to file away lessons learned for the future. One of the most significant is that while it’s intimidating to promote yourself as a candidate, in the face of the reluctance of individuals to engage and the malaise that seems to hang over the modern electoral process, the connections you make are invaluable and essential.
I’m not just talking about the encouragement offered by friends and family or the surprising shouts of support from acquaintances, sometimes strangers. My favourite example of the latter was a woman who said to me, “I was talking to my son in Singapore today and he said to vote for Reema Faris.” I didn’t know her, I don’t know her son, but I had been recommended as a candidate in a message sent out by a supporter to acquaintances and colleagues, one of whom was the man in Singapore!
Other connections, connections which may be transitory or incidental, take on additional significance during a campaign because they resonate with meaning. I wrote about one such connection last night: the story of my conversation with a teacher for the visually-impaired who I met during a meet and greet at the Park Royal Shopping Centre last weekend.
I had a number of conversations that day, all of them meaningful in their own way. And one that sticks with me was the interaction I had with a woman who shrugged apologetically in passing, saying that she didn’t have children in the school system.
With all the activity in the days since, my recollection of the details is already hazy, but I think she did pick up a copy of my brochure and we did talk briefly.
What was so significant about this interaction?
Well, I’ve heard that assertion before: “I don’t have children in the school system”. And while that would make the election of Trustees more directly relevant to a voter, the Board serves on behalf of the entire community. So while it’s critical that you get out to vote tomorrow, please take the time to encourage everyone you know who also votes to cast their ballots, not just for Mayor and Council, but for Trustees as well whether or not they have school-age children or grandchildren. The Board of Education is theirs and they have a right to exercise their discretion in choosing candidates who will serve on their behalf effectively, efficiently, diligently, and passionately.
As I hope to do in West Vancouver.
Out And About In West Vancouver – Part One
Last Saturday, Park Royal Shopping Centre offered council candidates the opportunity to hang out at “the mall” to meet voters.
Trustee candidates were not contacted directly, but Nora Gambioli, my friend and neighbour who is seeking election as a District councillor, let me in on the plans and we shared a display table in the centre court of the North Mall. Watching Nora engage people — she has campaigned before — inspired me and I enjoyed the time I spent meeting with residents and voters.
There was coffee on the go and sugar cookies decorated with reddish icing — the word “Vote” had been inscribed on the top of each treat. Passers-by were much happier taking the time to snag a cookie and a cup than they were to talk to candidates. However, connections were made and there was a full range of interaction that day: from the “I will avoid eye contact at any cost” to the “I’ll acknowledge with a smile, a nod and move on” to “I was wondering”.
One of the most informative discussions I had was with a teacher for the visually-impaired. She had previously worked in West Vancouver and now commutes to Surrey to teach there.
We had an engaging discussion and spoke at length about the challenges she faces in her work.
One of the most interesting points I took from our conversation — aside from the keen sense of her commitment to her students and her passion for her profession — had to do with how the nature of her work had changed.
She explained how visual-impairment now was often not treated as a singular challenge. That is, the students she works with now may be struggling with little or no vision, but they must also contend with other issues as well, such as autism or behavioural challenges.
Perhaps the ways in which student needs are identified have changed and the increasing sophistication of diagnosis has helped to identify a range of support and assistance required.
Our conversation emphasized how important it is, in addressing the special needs of students, to look at the whole individual. We have to identify the complete complex set of factors with which a child may be dealing, and we may not be able to rely on the work of one individual to help a child, no matter how committed or passionate, because their skills may only address one area of need — we need a team approach which capitalizes on the strengths and specializations of the personnel and resources available.
I know that the West Vancouver School District has worked very hard to help address the needs of its students. Jody Langlois and the team at Student Support Services do great work.
If elected, I look forward to learning more about the approach they’ve taken in West Vancouver to support our students. I hope also to work, as a Trustee, to make sure the programs in place continue to evolve and adapt to new research findings and new modalities of service in order to provide support and assistance to students with special needs on the basis of who they are as a whole, valued individual.
Why Women’s Rights Are An Education Priority
Here are some numbers I came across while preparing for an upcoming presentation:
- Women constitute 53% of the world’s population and own 1% of the wealth
- Women still earn 20% less than men
- In Canada, women occupy only 11% of the seats on corporate boards
- Of the 308 parliamentary seats in Canada’s House of Commons, only 68 (22%) are filled by women
- According to the New York-based Women’s Media Centre, only 3% of media decision makers are women
- In the 2010 Report on the Global Gender Gap issued by the World Economic Forum, which assesses criteria such as employment equity, health care, and political representation, Canada ranked #20 — a free-fall from #7 in 2005 — putting our country behind the US for the first time ever in terms of its treatment of the female population.
What does this all mean?
I think it means that even in our developed Western world, where gender inequalities are not as apparent as they may be elsewhere, there’s a lot of work to do in sustaining women’s rights and in working towards a better, more just society. There are worrying indications and further support to be found for this need in articles such as this one from The Globe & Mail on the reduction in the number of women appointed to the judiciary.
My focus here is not to talk about the broader social policy issues — at least not today — but I would like to address what I think this may mean in terms of educating young men and women, boys and girls.
Let’s look at what some consider the three levers of our modern society — money, politics, and the media — and some subject areas or topics which could be incorporated into or emphasized in the curriculum.
Money
On the premise that the more you understand money and how it works, the better you’ll manage your own financial situation. Are we teaching enough about:
- financial literacy and budgeting?
- economics and the history of financial economics?
- how to contend with the lure of consumerism?
Politics
Unless you learn why politics is important, how our system works, and its history, you’ll never see or understand the relevance to you and the world you live in.
- Why aren’t K-12 students exploring elections as they happen? In our community, students from Capilano University helped to run the All Candidates Meeting hosted by the West Vancouver Chamber of Commerce (Trustees were not included in the official proceedings). However, as far as I know, none of the municipal candidates were invited into schools to talk to students or to answer questions. If our intent is to improve the engagement of youth in the electoral process, why not take advantage of real life situations when they are current and relevant?
- Is the history of the struggle for women’s rights highlighted when Canadian history is being taught?
- Are biographies or autobiographies of Canadian women included on reading lists for social studies courses or even as examples of non-fiction in English or French language classes?
Media
It surrounds us, it influences us, it continually evolves and changes. In a recent CBC documentary, Naomi Wolf, author of The Beauty Myth, says she finds media images of women getting worse, reinforcing unrealistic expectations and norms. Are we doing enough to educate students about the media — advertising, movies, music videos, song lyrics, newscasts, etc. — and the influence it has on our behaviours and attitudes? Did you know that misogynist comments on-line are starting to drive female journalists and bloggers off-line according to a recent article in the UK newspaper, The Guardian. Women’s voices need to be heard and represented, not shrouded in the silence of earlier eras that would negate the work of great Canadians such as Henrietta Muir Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise McKinney, Emily Murphy, and Irene Parlby. https://archives.cbc.ca/on_this_day/10/18/
There are many other ideas and initiatives we could pursue and explore. Paying attention to these three areas would be a start because the issue of women’s rights is an issue of human rights — not just abroad, but here at home.
The Arts In Education – For A Better World
What a relief! Mark Mercer’s article in this morning’s newspaper reiterated that “universities are about education, about learning for the sake of learning” and that “university done rightly is great preparation for life”.
This was a welcome contrast to Margaret Wente’s recent diatribe against the Occupy protesters. With a swipe of her pen, she denigrates the value of the humanities. She seemingly fails to recognize that there are likely as many mechanical engineers out of work today as there are sociology students trying to find their way in life.
The business challenges we face and the deficiency in employment opportunities for young adults is not due to the educations they pursue; rather it reflects the reality of the structural weaknesses and flaws in our economies and societies.
And while we struggle to address these serious questions, as educators we need to ensure that we don’t lose sight of the value of the humanities in education and the value of the arts in our students lives.
When I walk down the hallways at my son’s school, I’m always struck by the amazing artwork the students produce: artwork directly related to the curriculum, the topics they are studying, and their learning. A lot does get done and I think that a lot more needs to be done to without imposing a further burden of delivery on teachers.
What if in-residence programs were implemented? For example, what if a published author served as writer-in-residence for the district? We have great visual artists on the North Shore — why can’t we look at having them conduct classes or organize field trips to their home studios throughout the year? Why can’t a professional dancer come in on an extended basis, once a week, to help choreograph a holiday show? Could we organize visits to Sinfonia’s (the North Shore’s professional orchestra) rehearsals? Why isn’t it automatically on the calendar every September and October for classes to take in sessions offered during the Vancouver International Writers Festival or Vancouver International Film Festival?
Some schools may be pursuing these sorts of projects and some schools aren’t. These type of initiatives, in my mind, would compliment teachers’ efforts and would be most viable in conjunction with greater support for specialist teachers (music, art, drama, dance, etc.) already hard at work. I also see that such programs would be most economically effective if delivered on a resource-sharing model between the district, the schools, and the Parent Advisory Councils (PACs).
I’m not advocating a specific approach or model because I don’t have all the information necessary to say which one will work the best. What I do know is that there is room to do more, much more. And we must do more because the arts, to me, are integral to the human experience and our children’s learning will be enhanced if art is more fully-integrated in their daily routines as a central component rather than as simply an adjunct.
I agree with Martha C. Nussbaum who writes in her 2010 book Not For Profit – Why Democracy Needs the Humanities:
“If we do not insist on the crucial importance of the humanities and the arts, they will drop away, because they do not make money. They only do what is much more precious than that, make a world that is worth living in, people who are able to see other human beings as full people, with thoughts and feelings of their own that deserve respect and empathy, and nations that are able to overcome fear and suspicion in favor of sympathetic and reasoned debate.”
I think there’s room to dispute her contention that the arts do not make money (look at this recent article by John Doyle on the profits made by private television broadcasters), but the point is that there is inherent value in the arts and humanities which we risk losing in a world solely focused on measurable utility and on money.
And isn’t that the ultimate purpose of education, as Nussbaum says, to “make a world that is worth living in, people who are able to see other human beings as full people”?
So let’s do that. Let’s make sure that our curricula do not sacrifice the arts. Let’s not make this a lesser world, but a better one.
Nerves, Questions, and Relevance
I was nervous.
It wasn’t my first speech nor my first All Candidates Meeting, and yet I hadn’t experienced as much anxiety during other principal campaign events, primarily the West Vancouver Citizens for Good Government (WVCGG) endorsement process and the Shaw TV taping.
This time, however, the evening was hosted by the West Vancouver District Parents Advisory Council (WVDPAC) and the audience was made up of parents with children in the public school system as well as educators who work in the district. These are individuals with a deep, passionate interest and commitment to public education and it showed in thequestions we were asked. Questions that ranged from the challenge of a primary school with under-enrollment to our experience with governance to the current job action and more. The most heart-felt question came from a Sentinel Secondary School coach and educator which touched on the application which the Labour Relations Board (LRB) is currently considering: one which includes a request by the employers group for a 15% reimbursement from the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (BCTF) for services not rendered as part of the on-going labour dispute.
Given the current structure of the public education system in BC, these are some of the toughest questions for a Trustee-candidate to answer because individual Trustees and individual Boards of Education may not wield as much impact as one would expect. While that may lead some to question the relevance of the Boards, I do think they’re essential as I mentioned in my presentation last night and as you’ll see in the accompanying text.
As to my nerves, they gradually wore off to a gentle flutter although having Mom and Dad in the audience, as well as my son, probably helped ramp up my stress level.
Even though it was a school night and I knew we’d be out late, I had my son with me. This was likely to be our last opportunity as Trustee-Candidates to speak to a larger group, and I wanted him to be a part of the process and to share the experience with me. On our way home, I asked what he thought of it all. “It was okay Mama,” he said. “But I thought it would be more like The Debaters on CBC. I thought after the speeches, they’d all talk together, the audience would vote and we’d get to go home.”
It may have been nice to incorporate more humour into the night’s proceedings, but unfortunately not much about education these days is a laughing matter.
Remarks presented at the West Vancouver District Parents Advisory Council (WVDPAC) All Candidates Meeting – November 3, 2011
My thanks to West Van DPAC for hosting this event, to Irene Leschert for moderating, and to you for being here this evening.
Are Boards of Education relevant? That’s a question that’s been put to me a few times since I declared my candidacy last month.
Yes, given the current context, Boards of Education are relevant; I think they’re essential. The Board acts on behalf of the community and helps to ensure that the public education system reflects the community it serves. Having the Board is the way in which we’re able to capture the essence of what’s unique about West Vancouver in the work that’s done in our schools.
That’s today. If, as part of the journey through the 21st century, the structure is to be reviewed, re-evaluated, and reinvigorated, then I’d like to be a part of that conversation to make sure the governance model we choose allows the system to work at its best.
As part of making the system work at its best, I’d like to reassess the monthly public Board meetings. I think there are ways to make the meetings more relevant to the community and to establish them as a forum for dialogue between all stakeholders.
I want to turn now to a subject that I’ve been grappling with and that’s the issue of technology in our schools. I believe that technology will be an integral feature of a great public education system because we live in a digital age and there is no turning back.
Having said that, I’d like to see us take the time to consider the challenge thoroughly and from all perspectives. Let’s take a moment to listen to parents’ concerns and adjust our approach accordingly.
Because, for me, thankfully, the world still operates on the basis of human connection. And to sacrifice that connection for the perceived benefits or cost savings of the latest tech wonder would be, in my mind, a mistake.
I enjoyed watching the video at the DPAC meeting yesterday which profiled the first hundred years of public education in West Van. The interviewer off-camera asked a number of people what they thought schools would look like in the future.
As I reflected on that question, I realized that my vision of personalized learning in the 21st century is not that of a student huddled in front of a computer, surrounded by gadgets all alone inside their home — even though we have the ability to engage people from around the world in multiple conversations in real time from our own spaces.
Let’s embrace technology, but let’s make sure it works for us, and not accept it blindly at the cost of losing the human connections which bind us together.
It’s an exciting time to be involved because we’re on the threshold of new ways and for the sake of our students we have to make sure that what we’re working towards is a better system.
Better for all those involved, but most importantly for the students who deserve to feel that their learning does matter to their future as well-rounded, critically-thinking, engaged citizens.
My name is Reema Faris and I hope I can count on your support at the ballot box on November 19th.
Thank you.